Home | Login | Register Now  [November 21, 2009 ]
Article Comments Home / eeForums / Community Forums / Article Comments
The Article Comments section collects messages you posted on individual articles and helps seek answers to your questions and open up discussions. Join now and rebut or support remarks on articles. Or start your own comment thread directly from industry news, new product coverage, technical papers and application notes.
Analysis: Is IBM turning over key IC tech to China?
Posted: Oct 21, 2009 3:10 AM

IBM Corp. has struck its second major chip deal in China, leaving questions on if the company is han...[ View complete article ]


Print  thread
Message:  Analysis: Is IBM turning over key IC tech to China? Post time:  Oct 21, 2009 3:10 AM
 

Author:David Dyde

Level:  Interns

Points:  142

Send Message

IBM Corp. has struck its second major chip deal in China, leaving questions on if the company is handing over technology to that nation without thinking about the possible consequences.
Reply with quote  Reply  Watch  Comment 
(1) Reply:Analysis: Is IBM turning over key IC tech to China? Post time:  Oct 21, 2009 3:10 AM
 

Author:David Dyde

Level:  Interns

Points:  142

Send Message

With all amner of automotive components GM did what Big Blue are doing - look where it put them!
Reply with quote  Reply  Comment 
(2) Reply:Analysis: Is IBM turning over key IC tech to China? Post time:  Oct 21, 2009 4:20 AM
 

Author:Harpat408

Level:  Interns

Points:  105

Send Message

This is a classical problem with the western capitalist system. It is not IBM that is turning over the key IC technology. It is the CEO of IBM or whoever in upper management who benefits from the ensuing bonus. If the CEO considers the long term consequences of this action, he may miss out on the bonus which can meet his lifetime needs for who knows what can happen in the next few years. He may be replced or some new technology may come up or a competitor may sell his technology.
Reply with quote  Reply  Comment 
(3) Reply:Analysis: Is IBM turning over key IC tech to China? Post time:  Oct 21, 2009 8:40 AM
 

Author:cc9

Level:  Interns

Points:  275

Send Message

not bad news, Chinese has money now and ibm requires more money to go through the crisis and develope more advantage tech for their competition in new turn. both sides are winner. but If I have money I will develope them by myself power. in order that so many Chinese talents can play their action in economic construction...
Reply with quote  Reply  Comment 
(4) Reply:Analysis: Is IBM turning over key IC tech to China? Post time:  Oct 21, 2009 10:04 PM
 

Author:Visitor 1118
Unlikely that SMIC will do anything significant at the 45nm node -- they only just got their 0.18u Flash process working properly after years and years of screw-ups. Unless SMIC fixes their systemic management issues, the other fabs don't have to fear competition from SMIC at 45nm, even with help from IBM...
Reply with quote  Reply  Comment 
(5) Reply: Analysis: Is IBM turning over key IC tech to China? Post time:  Oct 22, 2009 11:48 AM
 

Author:Visitor 8571
IBM is just transfering the fabrication process BUT Analog fabrication unlike Digital process is not something that can be simply switched from one process to another without some redesign.
Reply with quote  Reply  Comment 

Previous thread    TI upgrades Code Compo...
1,080p HD image sensor...    Next thread  
Quick Reply
*  Nickname: Visitor null(To avoid code verification, simply login or register with us. It is fast and free!)
*  Message title:
*  Comment:
*  Verify code:
The engineering community needs are best served with a professional environment at eeForums. And we need your help in ensuring eeForums best serves your needs. Please report offensive or irrelevant messages/replies by clicking here. Thank you for your help and participation!
Return to Article Comments | Community Forums
The views and opinions shared on eeForums and eeBlogs are those held by users of the web site and do not represent those of EE Times Asia. EE Times Asia is not liable or responsible for any defects, deficiencies, errors, omissions or inaccuracies in any information, data or other content (whether provided or offered therein or in or through eeForums and eeBlogs).
Back