Home | Login | Register Now  [November 21, 2009 ]
Article Comments Home / eeForums / Community Forums / Article Comments
The Article Comments section collects messages you posted on individual articles and helps seek answers to your questions and open up discussions. Join now and rebut or support remarks on articles. Or start your own comment thread directly from industry news, new product coverage, technical papers and application notes.
DFD bridges gap between system validation engineer, designer
Posted: Oct 31, 2009 3:57 PM

The Design-for-debug (DFD) system bridges the gap between the system validation engineer and designe...[ View complete article ]


Print  thread
Message:  DFD bridges gap between system validation engineer, designer Post time:  Oct 31, 2009 3:57 PM
 

Author:Visitor

Level:  Technical Director

Points:  6350

Send Message

The Design-for-debug (DFD) system bridges the gap between the system validation engineer and designer. It provides excellent visibility into silicon signal data, improves silicon debug productivity and minimizes system validation time. Here are a few do's and don'ts for DFD.
Reply with quote  Reply  Watch  Comment 
(1) Reply:DFD bridges gap between system validation engineer, designer Post time:  Oct 31, 2009 3:57 PM
 

Author:Visitor 1031
java
Reply with quote  Reply  Comment 

Previous thread    Reimagine current sens...
Navteq, Intel drive LB...    Next thread  
Quick Reply
*  Nickname: Visitor null(To avoid code verification, simply login or register with us. It is fast and free!)
*  Message title:
*  Comment:
*  Verify code:
The engineering community needs are best served with a professional environment at eeForums. And we need your help in ensuring eeForums best serves your needs. Please report offensive or irrelevant messages/replies by clicking here. Thank you for your help and participation!
Return to Article Comments | Community Forums
The views and opinions shared on eeForums and eeBlogs are those held by users of the web site and do not represent those of EE Times Asia. EE Times Asia is not liable or responsible for any defects, deficiencies, errors, omissions or inaccuracies in any information, data or other content (whether provided or offered therein or in or through eeForums and eeBlogs).
Back